Showing posts with label YT Critiques. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YT Critiques. Show all posts

August 06, 2023

YT Critiques – Bosnian Ape Society – The Whoppenheimer


 (Screenshot image taken from the YouTube account of 'Bosnian Ape Society')

This video was absolutely brilliant. I loved every aspect of what the creators did here. The crafting of dark ominous, shadowy images of a hamburger, the use of a rather moving overhead shot of a sesame bun, the quasi-comical display of lettuce and tomato slices dangling in mid-air as part of a series of images revealing the construction of this lethal culinary product, the subtly eerie dramatic background music, the use of stock images of explosions and sparks of light were so perfectly blended with clips from the latest Hollywood blockbuster bio-epic that it effortlessly attained an air of excessive pretension to the point of being absurdly satirical. The editing was so good that one could associate Cillian Murphy’s overbearing, hyperbolic acting with the burger in question. Did Murphy not raise his eyes at the thought of a sizzling hamburger patty? When Murphy questioned whether or not man can be trusted with a such a weapon, was he not referring to Burger King’s signature Whopper, which when combined with a special ingredient would get transformed into the Whoppenheimer?

March 17, 2023

YT Critiques – Irish Football Fans Fix a Car


Once again I feel compelled to state that YouTube is definitely not television. To further the notion consider this video featuring Irish football fans and a car with a dented roof. It’s short, simple and pointless to a degree, and yet it adequately captures the depths to which YouTube content can be so serendipitous and voyeuristic. These qualities offer a new paradigm in modern culture. Video content is no longer the domain of those who partake in extensive planning and staging. Video can now exist on the basis of unforeseen whims by those who have a mobile device on hand. Of course such amateurism is clearly present in this video by the lack of any narration, backstory, or context. And that’s to say nothing about the shoddy camera work seen in the early portion of the clip, as unidentified persons stick cash notes inside a car door as a gesture of goodwill towards its owner.

But then something strange happens. As the camera slowly pans to get a different perspective, a quasi-rhythmic pounding is heard in the distance. This is later accompanied by a joyous chant of “For the boys in green, fix the car” as several men starting pounding the roof around the dent. One man is even seen pointing at certain spots to hit as if he were a practitioner of some ancient, esoteric ritual. The video of course ends not long after the boisterous celebration that ensues once the dent is completely popped out. The rousing emotional intensity of this moment does plenty to explain why the video was uploaded, while also suggesting a new reality for our world, one in which few engrossing events, even those of a seemingly trivial significance, can go uncaptured.

March 14, 2023

YT Critiques – Smack the Pony – Architects

To date I have never considered YouTube as something akin to television. For me YouTube is too chaotic and anarchistic to be seen as analogous to traditional broadcast television. And yet this is what I find most fascinating about the medium; the fact that anyone could post video content about anything onto the platform (well at least confined to YouTube’s content policies, of course). In addition to this YouTube is adorned with some of the Internet’s most recognizable features, like the user comment section and the search box. To me there is a rather subtle revolutionary aspect to the search box that I still feel is largely understated and unappreciated. For embedded within this particular feature is a novel idea; that one has the ability to seek and find the content that they wish to consume. On the Internet one is not merely relegated to consume what is offered to them by the corporate administrators of the medium. The search box allows the Internet to take a modest step away from the latent, idle passivity that TV would demand. Simply put Internet content is meant to be found and discovered in ways that TV content is not.

February 06, 2023

YT Critiques – The Turbo Encabulator



(Screenshot image taken from the YouTube account of 'Dave Rondot')

The cinematographic approach was relatively unostentatious relaying efficiently on the same shot that vacillated between a close up view and a more distant perspective, with the latter offering the visual perceptibility of various unidentified mechanical parts of a possible automotive nature, a blackboard with an animated image of a Catalytic Converter cryptically placed amongst a series of unintelligible hand-written notes and most prominently a label-less diagram of some inscrutable technological object of unknown origin or purpose.

Any delectation in the video must arise from Bud Haggart in his role as the presenter of this rousing, burgeoning scientific advancement. Haggart spoke with an unassailable authority and indefatigable self-confidence that was wonderfully juxtapositioned against his somatic performance, which saw Haggart beautifully turn his head promptly at conductors and fluxes, and faintly raise his eyebrow at magneto reluctance and spurving bearings. At numerous junctures he would even gesture towards the diagram without any insinuation of incertitude.

Haggart never prompted the viewer to cerebrate his dominion over the subject manner, which was largely achieved due to the suave and perfectly polished manner in which he delivered the presentation’s sophisticated diction. This was no trifling undertaking given that the wording was such an opaque concoction of technical and enigmatically dense terminology that it would easily daunt and demean the public layman with its abstruse intelligence.

Initially there was a rather beguiling quality in how fastidious Haggart was in his disquisition, that is until such verisimilitude was broken at the mentioning of a ‘lunar waneshaft’, a phrase that ever so coyly suggested the satirically fraudulent nature of the work. Towards those who are not sufficiently conversant in technical and scientific matters, the lecture could be perceived as a cruel one in that it first bludgeoned the viewer with its imposing, impenetrable complexity before it ultimately ridiculed them for their attentiveness.